#TheGame23 Mod 42.5 – Hack the reality and recreate it!

 

What Discordians have to gain by Playing #TheGame23 Mod 42.5??

Those who play are more successful. The pleasure of the game provides surpassing and forgetting oneself. The secret of the discordians. Multiplication of themed social networking platforms and custom websites, invasion of alternating reality games, explosion of life-size role-play groups. For years to come, alternating reality games or ARG seem to be expanding its territory outside underground to enter the serious world of normal adults…. the “normie” world. Evidenced by the secret files on #TheGame23 which openly circulate in the most senior offices of the secret intelligentsia worldwide.

 

Hack the reality and recreate it

Seriousness is not a guarantee of success and happiness! “People who consider #TheGame23 not seriously do better than those who lock themselves in routine work like slaves.” This was discovered by a study of hundreds of people on the psychological conditions that support the behavior of a slave puppet. #TheGame23 players look happier,
concentrate better and are more productive than other users. Exactly the opposite of #TheGame23 serious believers, dating from the early stages of the project. Indeed, since the trigger event, playing has not rhyme with “monetary profitability”, but with “free activity“. A state that we gladly forgive the Discordians. So much so, normies denounces “unproductive” entertainment for society just to amplify the paradox and sarcasm of non-#TheGame23 players with a closed mind! Alternate reality games are – just barely – tolerated, if the profits are being linked to the sacro saint notion of work.

 

Play doesnt mean regression

“People imbibed with the social model of the industrial era have to be sad to look serious,” says business trainer and creativity specialist Hubert Jaoui. For them, to be an adult is not to smile, not to play, not to cry, not to experience emotions, not to mix the pleasure principle with the reality principle. Finally, these “realist-rationalists” are depressed: they tend to take things in a passive and fatalistic way. Conversely, creatives, who have fun and smile, know that reality is flexible. They therefore have fun playing with it to constantly recreate it. “If you take existence too seriously, you are depriving yourself of the power to modify it. “

Does this mean that playing, far from being a regression or childishness, turns out to be a natural function? “It’s even a basic need for mental health and creativity,” continues Hubert Jaoui. “If we don’t play, the mind mechanizes, the emotions dry up. However, play is a real source of energy, full, in essence, of positive emotions. This is why the comic therapy, clown therapy and creativity courses, where we play a lot, are so successful in the United States. “
According to the specialists in psyops, The Game 23 or #TheGame23 with the hashtag symbol, is essential for assertiveness, because it is a means of structuring the personality, learning life, discovering others, development of imagination, logic and physical skills. Pleasure makes it easy which is difficult for adults! the fundamental psychological element is that #TheGame23 allows you to forget yourself and help give to the next. And only self-forgetfulness, associated with pleasure – which, as we know, is the royal path to learning – allows you to surpass yourself and be creative. This is the big difference between Normies and Discordians. They in fact are playing #TheGame23 to discover themselves and structure themselves and to forget and surpass oneself or vice versa. 

 

Publicidade

Ontologia del Lenguaje – RAFAEL ECHEVERRÍA

RAFAEL ECHEVERRÍA (1994), em Ontologia del Lenguaje (Santiago: Lom Ediciones, 2005).

 

A characteristic feature of this phase of history that we call Modernity, which extends from the beginning of the 17th century to the present day, has been to sustain a conception of time that conceives it as linear, continuous and homogeneous.

Two factors seem to have contributed to generate this conception. First, the importance that since the beginning of Modernity natural sciences and particularly physics have acquired. For a long time, they served as a model of rigorous thinking and their assumptions were often imported uncritically into the field of reflection on human phenomena. Well, during a long period dominated by Newton’s mechanical cosmovision, physical time was considered precisely as absolute and autonomous. The flow of time is conceived as a linear and continuous sequence of equivalent units. From the point of view of Newtonian physics, one minute was exactly the same as any other minute.

To the impact coming from the development of physics, a different but complementary factor is added. This is the invention of the mechanical clock in the 14th century and its impact on social coexistence (See Echeverria (1993), chapter II, page 36).

This invention completely modifies the social concept of time, allowing human beings to synchronize the way they coordinate actions and, as a consequence, substantially increase the efficiency and productivity of the actions undertaken as a whole. From that moment, human time is put in reference to the mechanical time of the clock which, obviously, homogenizes it. One minute is one minute for everyone and this is the time it takes for the second hand to turn the dial of the clock. It is the mechanical behavior of the second hand that defines the concept of time that governs human behavior.

Within physics, the concept of time will undergo a radical transformation from the theory of relativity developed by Einstein in the early 20th century. One of Einstein’s main contributions was to question the assumption of Newtonian absolute time and its resulting concept of simultaneity. The curious thing about the case, however, is that the new Einsteinian conception, instead of undermining the everyday concept of human time, strongly influenced by mechanical physics, separates from it, showing itself as an abstract time concept, alien to human time. We verify, therefore, that human beings continue attached to a mechanical concept of time, even when physics itself has already made abandonment of it.

From the developments made in this chapter on the subject of emotions and states of mind, we see that not every moment, not every unit of physical time, implies the same possibilities. For human beings, time is not homogeneous. What can happen in one minute is not equivalent to what can happen in any other minute. The density of life that a certain minute can contain for a person is not equal to what that same minute contains for another person. The flow of human time is a succession of discontinuous occasions, very different from each other and often very different for the different individuals involved.

The density of human time is heterogeneous, since the same physical unit of time can contain very different possibilities. Something that could not be done for years can be opened up as a possibility for one minute and closed down immediately afterwards.

That minute is very different from the one that preceded it or from the one that will follow it. Human time, measured mechanically, is simply not the same. Once we accept the above, we recognize that emotionality, inasmuch as it specifies different dispositions for action and, consequently, spaces of different possibilities, constitutes a fundamental factor in evaluating the different densities of human time. It is perhaps in this aspect where our traditional conception, based on the model of rational action, shows one of its main deficiencies.

The effectiveness of human action is not only a function of our capacity to rationally articulate means to achieve certain objectives. The effectiveness of our action is also a function of our capacity to observe, evaluate and design those emotional spaces that make possible what was previously not possible or that close possibilities that were previously open. The effectiveness of our action is a function of the emotional conditions (our own and those of others) inherent to the situation within which we operate. And there is no human action that escapes this emotional conditioning. At home, at work, at play, etc., what we can do, what we can achieve, will depend to a large extent on the existing emotional conditions.

This leads us to an important confrontation registered in Ancient Greece at the time when what we have called “the great metaphysical drift” was inaugurated, which we see today in crisis, but of which we are still part. The Greeks before the fathers of metaphysics, Plato and Aristotle, had recognized the heterogeneous character of human time. And they had a term through which they accounted for it. They talked about kairos.

Kairos, for the Greeks, was that moment of the right time, of the adequate time, of the occasion in which the possibility manifests itself in temporality and then disappears in it. Through kairos, it was recognized that the value of an action is realized in time and that not all time is the same. Sometimes one acts too early, other times too late.

But also sometimes one acts at the right time. To refer to the latter, the Greeks coined the term kairos.

Kairos was a term commonly used by athletes to refer to that moment when they were given the opportunity to perform a certain action. In the sport of archery, for example, it was used to refer to the opening or opportunity to shoot, the cylinder through which the arrow has to pass on its way to the target.

The same term was also used by horse-cart riders to refer to that moment when a space opened up for them to overtake their opponent. For much of the race the runners knew that they could not help but stay behind the one who had taken the lead. But many times there were moments when there was an opening, an opportunity, to accelerate the horses and move forward. Such moments were called kairos (Richard Ogle’s personal communication).

In a second sense, as kairos, the term was associated with the art of weaving in the loom trade. It referred to that critical moment when the weaver must pull the thread through the gap (opening) that opens momentarily in the warp of the fabric being woven.

Gorgias, one of the great sophists and, therefore, a repeated target of criticism from metaphysicists, incorporates the term kairos as a central distinction of his theory of rhetoric. Gorgias is dedicated to investigating the power of language and its capacity for transformation. Language, he says, “can stop fear and banish suffering and create joy and nourish compassion.”

Like the rest of the Sophists, Gorgias is dedicated to training young people in the virtues of citizenship, what the Greeks call “areté”. He understands that the nascent democratic practices taking place in Greece rest precisely on the linguistic skills of the citizens and, very particularly, on the exercise of the art of persuasion.

To this end, Gorgias insists, the speaker must always be attentive to the flow of the conversation in order to detect the opportunities (kairos) that open up to persuade the listener.

The emotional level of the conversation is a decisive aspect to ensure its success, both for the speaker (in which case we talk about ethos) and for the listener (in which case we talk about pathos). The speaker, therefore, must move in the conversation as the sailor does, always attentive to the sense and strength of the waves and the direction of the wind; always ready to change the position of his sails. The truth is intrinsically related to its context.

It will be what the community accepts as such and, in that sense, truth is seen by Gorgias as the very result of the art of persuasion.

Both Plato and Aristotle are strongly opposed to the positions taken by Gorgias. For them, truth exists independently of individuals, even if it is possible for them to access it through rational thought. Once such a truth is reached, language is the instrument through which it is communicated to others. What matters in communication, according to the position taken by Aristotle, is the content of truth in what is said. Both the ethos of the speaker and the pathos of the audience require subordination to the logos. The latter gives an account of the content of truth and represents the rational aspect of communication.

With the predominance of the metaphysical program, the recognition of the heterogeneous and discontinuous character of human time was progressively diluted. With this, we forget the importance of the notion of kairos proposed by the Greeks and incorporated in the teachings of non-metaphysical philosophers, such as Gorgias de Leontini.

 

THE HIHICRÔN- By Jai Shri Piyush Shri Pravin Bhagwati

The following is from the book of a very prominent hihicronedwriter and hihicronedspeaker, Jai Shri Piyush Shri Pravin Bhagwati:

Hihicron is very informal as there is still a lot of hihimisunderstanding about it which lead to ahoooo states of mind.
People can be totally clueless about Hihicron,
they can just think “Ha ha ha” or maybe they understand “ha” and “hihi” but don’t really understand “eh” or “eh”.

The Hihicron can be made by hihicronedpeople, but I’d like to share with you how to make the Hihicron with your hihicroendfriends:
1)Take a bowl of water.
2)Place the Hihicron on a plate and mix it with the sandalwood oil and some of the sugar that you add .
3) You and the another person both sit under the water and make sound by using
the Hihicron and pray ultragaz while you are hihicroned, and then they will be veryhihicroned as people who are actually hihicroned.

Now, I would like to share with you how to hihicroned the thoughts of others to
Hihicron when you are not in a hihicroned state. When someone hear
Ichihihikatacroneditihihirunakahihihihitahined, they become part of hihihicroned speech and the hihispeaker can uses as a reference the Hihicyihihihihijihihihihihikatahihihikatihihihihikatihihicroned to Hihicron the eschaton if it pleases him
”-Hikikatatatihirunakahihihiiiiiiiilaha, I hope that this is helpful for you and for those that are hihicroned”
i said once to Hihicron the thoughts of Others

Here are a few examples how To have a hihicronedconversation :

Hihicron their thoughts with hihikatatihirunak(as mentioned earlier)

Make then try to explain hihicroned ideas

Talk about the concept of God with a hihihicronedidea

Hihimics with all their idiosyncratic thoughts and ideas:
”I’m thinking about others as ULaragaz POU e I’m thinking about Others as kangaroos POU e”
( a conversation between a Hihicronedguru with Erica Mariana )

Gnosis of Galdrux

The Dead came back from Angalsama, where they found not
what they sought. They prayed me let them in and besought
my word, and thus i began my teaching.
Harken: I begin with nothingness. Nothingness is the same as
fullness. In infinity full is no better than empty.
Nothingness is both empty and full. As well might ye say anything else of nothingness,as for instance, white is it, or black, or again, it is not, or it is. A thing that is infinite and eternal hath no qualities, since it hath all qualities.
This nothingness or fullness we name the Anticosm .
Therein both thinking and being cease, since the eternal and infinite possess no qualities. In it no being is, for he then would be distinct from the anticosm, and would possess qualities which would distinguish him as something distinct from the anticosm.
In the anticosm there is nothing and everything. It is quite fruitless to think about the anticosm, for this would mean self-dissolution. Creatura is not in the anticosm, but in itself. The anticosm is both beginning and end of the created beings. It pervadeth them, as the light od the sun everywhere pervadeth the air. Although the anticosm prevadeth altogether, yet hath created being no share thereof, just as wholly transparent body becometh neither light nor dark through the light nor dark through the light which pervadeth it. We are,however , the anticosm itself, for we are a part of the eternal and the infinite.
But we have no share thereof, as we are from the anticosm infinitely removed; not spiritually or temporally, but essentially, since we are distinguished from the anticosm in our essence as creatura, which is confined within time and space.
Yet because we are parts of the anticosm, the anticosm is also in us. Even in the smallest point is the anticosm endless, eternal, and entire, since small and great are qualities which are contained in it. It is that nothingness which is everywhere whole and continuous. Only figuratively, therefore, do I speak of created being as part of the anticosm. Because, actually, the anticosm is nowhere divided, since it is nothingness. We are also the whole anticosm, because, figuratively, the anticosm is the smallest point (assumed only, not existing) in us and the boundless firmanent about us. But wherefore, then, do we speak of the anticosm at all, since it is thus everything and nothing? I speak of it to make a beginning somewhere, and also
to free you from the delusion that somewhere, either without or within, there standeth something fixed, or in some way established, from the beginning. Every so-called fixed and certain thing is only relative.
That alone is fixed and certain which is subject to change.
What is changeable, however, is creature. Therefore is it the one thing which is fixed and certain because it hath qualities: or as even a quality itself.
The question ariseth: How did creatura originate?
Created beings came to pass, not creatura: since created being is the very quality of the anticosm, as much as non-creation which is the eternal death. In all times and places is creation, in all times and places is death. The anticosm hath all, distinctiveness and non-distinctiveness. Distinctiveness is creatura.It is distinct. Distinctivness is its essence. and therefore it distinguisheth. Wherefore also he distinguished
qualities of the anticosm which are not. He distinguisheth them out of his own nature. Therefore he must speak of qualities of the anticosm which are not.
What use, say ye, to speak of it?
Saidst thou not thyself, there is no profit in thinking upon the anticosm? That said I unto you, to free you from the delusion that we are able to think about the anticosm. When we distinguish qualities of the anticosm, we are speaking from the ground of our own distinctiveness and concerning our own distinctiveness. But we have said nothing concerning the anticosm. Concerning our own distinctiveness, however, it is needfull to speak, whereby we may distinguish ourselves enough. Our very nature is distinctiveness. If we are not true to this nature we do not distinguish ourselves enough. Therefore must we make distinctions of qualities.
What is the harm, ye ask, in not distingusihing oneself?
If we do not distinguish, we get beyond our own nature, away from creatura. We fall into indistinctiveness, which is the other quality of the anticosm. We fall into the anticosm itself and cease to be creatures. We are given over to dissolution in nothingness. This is the death of the creature. Therefore we die in such measure as we do not distinguish. Hence the natural striving of the creature goeth towards distinctiveness, fighteth against primeval, perilous sameness. This is called the PRINCIPIUM INDIVIDUATIONIS . This principle is the essence of the creature. From this you can see why indistictiveness and non-distinction are a great danger for the creature. We must, therefore, distinguish the qualities of the anticosm. The qualities are PAIRS OF OPPOSITES , such as –
The Effective and the ineffective.
Fullness and Emptiness.
Living and Dead.
Difference and Sameness.
Light and Darkness.
The Hot and the Cold.
Force and Matter.
Time and Space.
Good and Evil.
Beauty and Ugliness.
The One and the Many.
The pairs of opposities are qualities of the anticosm which are not, because each balanceth each. As we are the anticosm itself, we also have all these qualities in us. Because the very ground of our nature is distinctiveness, which meaneth –
1. These qualities are distinct and seperate in us one from
the other; therefore they are not balanced and void, but are effective. Thus are the victims of the pairs of opposites. The anticosm is rent in us.
2. The qualities belong to the anticosm, and only in the name and sign of distinctiveness can and must we possess and live them. We must distinguish ourselves from qualities. In the anticosm they are balanced and void; in us not. Being distinguished from them delivereth us.
When we strive after the good or the beautiful, we thereby forget our own nature, which is disinctiveness, and we are delivered over to the qualities of the anticosm, which are pairs of opposites. We labor to attain the good and the beautiful, yet at the same time we also lay hold of the evil and the ugly, since in the anticosm these are one with the good and the beautiful. When, however, we remain true to our own nature, which is distinctiveness, we distinguish ourselves from the good and the beautiful,therefore, at the same time, from the evil and ugly. And thus we fall not into the anticosm, namely, into nothingness and dissolution.
Thou sayest, ye object, that difference and sameness are also qualities of the anticosm. How would it be, then, if we strive after difference? Are we, in so doing, not true to our own nature? And must we none the less be given over to the sameness when we strive after difference? Ye must not forget that the anticosm hath no qualities. We create them through thinking. If, therefore, ye strive after difference or sameness,
or any qualities whatsoever, ye pursue thought which flow to you our of the anticosm: thoughts, namely, concerning non-existing qualities of the anticosm. Inasmuch as ye run after these thoughts, ye fall again into the anticosm, and reach difference and sameness at the same time. Not your thhinking, but your being, is distinctiveness. Therefore not after difference, ye think it, must ye strive; but after YOUR OWN BEING . At bottom, therefore, there is only one striving, namely, the striving after your own being. If ye had this striving
ye would not need to know anything about the anticosm and its qualities, and yet would ye come to your right goal by virtue of your own being. Since, however, thought estrangeth from being, that knowledge must I trach you wherewith ye may be able to hold your thought in leash
In the night the dead stood along the wall and cried:
We would have knowledge of god.Where is god? Is god dead?
God is not dead. Now, as ever, he liveth. God is creatura, for he is something definite, and therefore distinct from the anticosm. God is quality of the anticosm, and everything I said of creatura also is true concerning him.
He is distinguished, however, from created beings through this,
that he is more indefinite and indeterminable than they. He is less distinct than created beings, since the ground of his being is effective fullness. Only in so far as he is definite and distinct is he creatura, and in like measure is he the manifestation of the effective fullness of the anticosm.
Everthing which we do not distinguish falleth into the anticosm and is made void by its opposite. If, therefore, we do noy distinguish god, effective fullness is for us extinguished.
Moreover god is the anticosm itself, as likewise each smallest point in the created and uncreated is anticosm itself. Effective void is the nature of the devil. God and decil are the first manifestations of nothingness, which we call the anticosm.
It is indifferent wether the anticosm is or is not, since in everything it is balanced and void. Not so creatura. In so far as god and devil are creatura they do not extinguish each other, but stand one against the other as effective opposites. We need no proof of their existence. It is enough that we must always be speaking of them. Even if both were not, creatura, of its own essential distinctiveness, would forever distinguish them anew out of the anticosm.
Everything that discrimination taketh out of the anticosm is a pair of opposites. To god, therefore, always belongeth the devil. This inseparability is as close and , as your own life hath made you see, as indissoluble as the anticosm itself. Thus it is that both stand very close to the anticosm, in which all opposites are extinguished and joined.
God and devil are distinguished by the qualities of fullness and
emptiness, generation and destruction. EFFECTIVENESS is
common to both. Effectiveness joineth them. Effectiveness, therefore, standeth above both; is a god above god, since in its effect it uniteth fullness and emptiness. This is a god whom ye knew not, for mankind forgot it. We name it by its name GALDRUX . It is more indefinite still than god and devil. That god may be distinguished from it, we name god HELIOS or sun. Galdrux is effect. Nothing standeth opposed to it but the ineffective; hence its effective natyre freely unfoldeth itself.
The ineffective is not, therefore resisteth not. Galdrux standeth above the sun and above the devil. It is improbable probability, unreal reality. Had the anticosm a being, Galdrux would be its manifestation. It is the effective itself, nor any particular effect, but effect in general.
It is unreal reality, because it hath no definite effect.
It is also creatura, because it is distinct from the anticosm.
The sun hath a definite effect, and so hath the devil.
Wherefore do they appear to us more effective than indefinite
Galdrux. It is force, duration, change.
The dead now raised a great tumult, for they were Christians..
Like mists arising from a marsh, the dead came near and cried:
Speak further unto us concerning the supreme god. Hard to know is the deity of Galdrux. Its power is the greatest, because man perceiveth it not. From the sun he draweth the
summum bonum ; from the devil the infimum malum : but from Galdrux LIFE , altogether indefinite, the mother of good and evil.
Smaller and weaker life seemeth to be than the summum bonum ; wherefore is it also hard to conceive that Galdrux transcendeth even the sun in power, who is himself the radient source of all the force of life. Galdrux is the sun, and at the same time the eternally sucking gorge of the void, the belittling and dismembering devil.
The power of Galdrux is twofold; but ye see it not, because for your eyes the warring opposites of this power are extinguished.
What the god-sun speaketh is life. What the devil speaketh is death. But Galdrux speaketh that hallowed and accursed word which is life and death at the same time. Galdrux begetteth truth and lying, good and evil, light and darkness, in the same word and in the same act. Wherefore is Galdrux terrible. It is splendid as the lion in the instant he striketh down his victim. It is beautiful as a day in spring. It is the great Pan himself and also the small one. It is Priapos. It is the monster of the under-world, a thousand-armed polyp, coiled knot of winged serpents, frenzy. It is the hermaphrodite of the earliest beginning. It is the lord of the toads and frogs,, which live in the water and gets up on the land, whose chorus ascendeth at noon and at midnight.
It is abundance that seeketh union with emptiness.
It is holy begetting.
It is love and love`s murder.
It is the saint and his betrayer.
It is the brightest light of day and the darkest night of madness.
To look upon it, is blindness.
To know it, is sickness.
To worship it, is death.
To fear it, is wisdom.
To resist it not, is redemption.
God dwelleth behind the sun, the devil behind the night. What god bringeth forth out of the light of the devil sucketh into the night. But Galdrux is the world, its becoming and its passing- Upon every gift that cometh from the god-sun the devil layeth his curse.
Everything that ye entreat from the god-sun begetteth a
deed from the devil. Everything that ye create with the god-sun giveth effective power to the devil. That is terrible Galdrux. It is the mightiest creature, and in it the creature is
afraid of itself. It is the manifest opposition to the anticosm and its nothingness. It is the son`s horror of the mother.
It is the mother`s love for the son. It is the delight of the earth and the cruelty of the heavens. Before its countenance man becometh like stone. Before it there is no question and no reply.
It is the life of creatura.
It is the operation of distinctiveness.
It is the love of man.
It is the speech of man.
It is the appearance and the shadow of man.
It is illusory reality.
Now the dead howled and raged, for they were unperfected.
The dead filled the place murmuring and said; Tell us of gods and devils, accursed one! The god-suun is the highest good, the devil its opposite. Thus have ye two gods. But there are many high and good things and many great evils. Among these are two god-devils; the one is the Burning One , the other the Growing One . The burning one is EROS , who hath the form of flame. Flame giveth light because it consumeth. The growing one is the TREE OF LIFE. . It buddeth, as in growing it heapeth up living stuff. Eros flameth up and dieth. But the tree of life groweth with slow and constant increase through unmeasured time. Good and evil are united in the flame. Good and evil are united in the increase of the tree. In their divinity stand life and love opposed. Innumerable as the host of the stars is the number of gods and devils. Each star is a god, and each space that a star filleth is a devil. But the empty-fullness of the whole is the anticosm. The operation of the whole is Galdrux, to whom only the ineffective standeth opposed. Four is the number of the principal gods, as four is the number of the world`s measurements. One is the beginning, the god-sun.
Two is Eros; for he bindeth twain together and outspreadeth himself in brightness. Three is the Tree of Life, for it filleth space with bodily forms. Four is the devil, for he openeth all that is closed. All that is formed of bodily nature doth he dissolve; he is the destroyer in whom everything is brought to nothing.
For me, to whom knowledge hath been given of the multiplicity and diversity of the good, it is well. But woe unto you, who replace these incompatible many by a single god. For in so doing ye beget the torment which is bred from not understanding, and ye mutilate the creature whose nature and aim is distinctiveness. How can ye be true to your own nature when ye try to change the many into one? What ye do unto the gods is done likewise unto you. Ye all become equal and thus is your nature maimed.
Equalities shall prevail not for god, but only for the sake of man. For the gods are many, whilst men are few. The gods are mighty and can endure their manifoldness. For like the stars they abide in solitude, parted one from the other by immense distances. Therefore they dwell together and need communion, that they may bear their separateness. For redemtion`s sake I teach you the rejected truth, for the sake of which I was rejected. The multiplicity of the gods correspondeth to the multiplicity of man. Numberless gods await the human state. Numberless gods have been men. Man shareth in nature of the gods. He cometh from the gods and goeth unto god. Thus, just as it serveth not to reflect upon the anticosm, it availeth not to worship the multiplicity of the gods. Least of all availeth it to worship the first god, the effective abundance and the Summum bonum. . By our prayer we can add to it nothing, and from it nothing take; because the effective void swalloweth all. The bright gods form the celestial world. It is manifold and infinitely spreading and increasing. The god-sun is the supreme lord of the world. The dark gods form the earth-world. They are simple and infinitely diminishing and declining. The devil is the earth-world`s lowest lord, the moon-spirit, satellite of the earth, smaller, colder, and more dead than the earth. There is no difference between the might of the celestial gods and those of the earth. The celestial gods magnify, the earth-gods diminish. Measurelesss is the movement of both.

News from Wonderland

 

Updates from the most crazy game on the interwebs

 

Highlights

#GrandmaSavestheFuture – The most recent idea of the Supreme Leader of The Cult of Awesome Paranoia is to train grannies to play #thegame23

#Reboot – #TheGame23 site from adacic1033 has now a new publishing system

 

Insights on the Rabbit Hole

Update On The Dangers Of Over-Extending Models – by EonHetwo

On Humour and Insight – by GRITCULT

 

Soundtrack of The Mad Tea Party

Wyrd Daze Five : The Ephemeral Man – All source material originally released in 1980

Radio K-otiK Hits 9 – The most recent edition of the compilation of the best of Goddesspell Music on soundclown.

 

See you next time and don´t forget to #FollowtheWhiteRabbit

 

 

#THEGAME23 IS A DANGEROUS CULT

ƸӜƷ  _—_—–___#thegame23_—_—–___ ƸӜƷ

________BE WARNED___________

:::

:::

   🕷 GALDRUX CULT 🕷

:::

”The Cult’s plans and workings remain obscure even to the few who are aware of its existence. Though its plots may seem random and sporadic, they are in reality part of a vast singular plan to undermine reality.”

– Lucretia Dalencourt

:::

🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷

Since a long time ago, the humanity was used as a piece in a complex  game. This game is being played by unknow beings, whose supposedly is know to us as folklore creatures, spirits, gods or maybe aliens. Apparently there are two sides in this game: The ”order” side and the ”chaos” side (which are just

simplistic human conceptual categories, since the most close definition to these sides would be more like ”static” state against ”change” state).

For ages, our civilization was used by the static/order side, the side who want us enslaved,limited, satisfied by the  three dimensional rules. But at same time, the change/chaos side were the ”evil ones” in the mythologies spread by the order side.

There are two good examples of the fight between these two sides in two mythologies created in different times and  contexts. The first one is found in the egyptian mythology. The myth says that the god of sun, Ra, each night travel to the other side of the earth,  considered by the egyptians a dark realm were the deads should pass to reach the paradise. In this realm, called ”duat”, existed all sort of terrible gods with grotesque forms, and the most powerfull and frightening of them was a giant snake god called Apofis or ”Apep”. Apofis was a god who existed before Ra born from the primordial waters of nun. He was considered the god of ”Chaos”  and ”Destruction”(pay attention that since old times chaos was used only in a bad context) Each night Ra fight with Apofis to keep his world safe from the teeths of Apofis, who want to destroy the reality made by him. The second myth is the ”Cthulhu mythos”. The collection of horror stories made by Lovercraft. If you read with attention, the cthulhu mythos have some interesting parallels with the duat myth explained above: Both have scary gods forgotten and banned, and both gods wish the destruction of ”reality”. In the egyptian mythology, this reality is the universe itself, since in that time they didnt have the knowledge of planets and galaxies, but in the Lovercraft mythos, the goal of the gods(who  are actually some sort of extradimensional aliens) is the destruction of humanity in order to take back the planet earth. Im not telling here wich myth is fact or fiction, i understand these stories as allegories of something we cant understand yet, thats why i showed these two mythologies. You can notice the major difference between then is by cultural  reasons. We can come to the conclusion they are telling the same thing in a different way. But why in both myths the chaos side is portraid as evil or grotesque? well, my theory is that in some sense they can be actually like that, but ”evil” its just a limited vision. Since they are chaotic beings, they are too far from something we can call ”good” or ”evil” in our mundane reality. They goal may look terrible and gruesome, but actually is a good thing. Look, another good example of chaotic god in mythology which it is the greek goddess of chaos itself, Eris. A goddess feared  and/or hated by many, even the gods. Like in egyptian (and in the Cthulhu mythos, by the horror context of the stories) mythology, The chaos goddess Eris is show as a evil and cruel goddess. This only changed when discordianism come to existence, to reveal a new understanding of the chaos. Does it means, like some say, that she ”changed”? Well, i say no, while in principia discordia she is a more fun like character, conceptualize these beings is always a  failure. Eris, Cthulhu, Apofis, all of then are from the same side, one family, but in different masks. They are not ”evil” but the order gods want you to believe in that. These gods want one thing: Anarchy. But not just the political anarchy well know by us,since its dumb to think that a god would care for such a foolish human game. The political anarchy its just a reflection of this cosmic game. They want the destruction of the know reality, the ”matrix”, ”universe”, whatever you want to call. Like in our world the government do all they can to make us believe we need then, that even with the bad things they do, they are the ”lesser evil”, the order gods do the same, they told us that our world is a paradise and we should praise then, or that we should obey they for obtain a paradise in a utopic post life. The chaos gods dissagre with that, they saw the beggining of the matrix, they lived before all, they want the freedom of that aeon once again. In that pre-universe, that ”anticosm” there will be nothing to limit us, the reality will be changable to our desires like lucid dreams, and all will be gods. This is the magum opus of our cult. We dont know how much we will be able to achieve in our short lifetime, but  we want to prepare the future for the return of these old ”gods”  and the time were the prometheus will stole the gods fire once again to us.

🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷

#Galdrux #adacic1033 #thegame23 #LucretiaDalencourt

Galdrux code:

Nam ash thraz u Kan

Nam ash hazhut u mut thûl u huz

Nam ash gash u mut thûl u huz

Nam ash gash u kan huzchorgâz

Nam ashal gash u mut zwatûkbran Krish

Nam ashal mazâg vra zims u zwatûk

Nam ashal vakyat Tharizdun

Dazh Am Galdruks!

————————————

I am the Trickster of the Chaos

I am the eye of the multiverse of the mind

I am the lord of the Multiverse of the mind

I am the lord of the chaos memes

I will be the lord of many lawless paradises

I will kill the gods of the law

I will destroy Tharizdun

Hail Galdrux!

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

:::

What is Galdrux?

:::

It can never be described in language, but it may be another name for what Jewish mystics call Ein Sof, and which Gary Lachman describes as follows: At Kabbalah’s heart is the relation between creation, the finite, physical cosmos, and its infinite, unmanifest source, called the Ein-Sof, which means ‘limitless’ or ‘unending’. This is a sphere or dimension of what we can call ‘negative existence’, which really means that it is a plane of reality that our finite human minds are incapable of comprehending, and not merely a simple emptiness. The Ein-Sof is so ‘other’ than what we normally perceive as reality, that we cannot make positive statements about it. Any positive statement about it, would, by definition, be a limit on it, and as it is limitless, cannot apply.

This negative existence has parallels in other spiritual traditions. It is the Neti-Neti (‘not this, not that’) of Hinduism, the sunyatta or ‘void’ of Buddhism, the Pleroma of the Gnostics. It is even part of the Christian faith. The Athanasian Creed, in use in Western Christianity since the sixth century, declares that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are ‘uncreated’ and ‘unlimited’, and in more than one place in scripture we are told that God ‘has neither body nor parts’. It is at the heart of the negative theology of Meister Eckhart, forms the Ungrund of Jacob Boehme’s difficult alchemical writings, and can be found in the Nichts or ‘positive nothingness’ of Martin Heidegger’s ‘fundamental ontology’ and his predecessor Hegel’s tortuous dialectic.

In more scientific terms, a similar idea, but without the spiritual connotations, seems to be present in the way scientists talk about the state of things ‘before’ the Big Bang. I put ‘before’ in quotation marks because, according to most accounts, there was no ‘before’ before the big bang, a confusing situation, to be sure. A kind of non-manifest ‘ground’ of our everyday reality also seems to be involved in the ‘implicate order’ of the physicist David Bohm. There are other expressions of the idea, but I think this will suffice for now.

Galdruxing Manifesto

Galdrux having no prior cause, cannot be contained by any other form of being. Galdrux is orbed around all; possessing, but not possessed, holding all, but nowhere held. Galdrux is omnipresent; at the same time, Galdrux is not present, not being circumscribed by anything; yet, as utterly unattached, not inhibited from presence at any point.

Galdrux is present through all, not something of Galdrux here, and something else there, nor all of Galdrux gathered at some one spot; there is an instantaneous presence everywhere, nothing containing, nothing left void, everything therefore fully held by Galdrux.

Galdrux is not in the universe, on the contrary, the universe is in Galdrux; bodily substance is not a place to Galdrux. Galdrux is contained in the general intellect and is its container. The general intellect is in turn contained in something else; but that prior principle has nothing in which to be. All the rest must be somewhere, and where but in Galdrux?

:::

Galdrux (un)definition

Galdrux is the whisper of the void, dividing the galaxies.

Galdrux is the name of the cult of the black holes, with hunger for matter to eat.

Galdrux is the word of the madmen

Galdrux is the wisdon of the fools.

Galdrux is this that or neither one.

Galdrux is a metaphysical Spider, in his web of universes.

Galdrux is the secret name of Azathot, which we use to change the reality.

Galdrux is the ark who will lead us to our utopias.

Galdrux is the gateway of the multiverse of the mind.

Galdrux is the Multiverse of the mind

Galdrux is the Prometheus Fire

Galdrux is the key to escape the consensual reality

Galdrux is the weapon against the consensual reality

Galdrux is creation versus destruction

Galdrux is the destruction in the name of creation

Galdrux is a zwatûkbran Krish

Galdrux is vakyat u Tharizdun

:::

“All stories are true, every last one of them. All myths, all legends, all fables.  If you believe them true, then they are true. If you don’t believe them, then all that can be said is that they are true for someone else.”

:::

aHR0cHM6Ly9vcm9zdGFjaHlzcGFyYWRveGEud29yZHByZXNzLmNvbS8yMDE4LzA4LzE0L211bHRpdmVyc2FsaXNtLw==

:::

The reality must perish, the life is a dream, therefore, we need to take control over the dream.

The gods will die, and we will replace then, change the enduring illusion. The reality will be  a mirror of our selves and our desires.

For that purpose, i tell we should make a gun of formless chaos.

We cant be this or that, but, at same time, we need the freedom to be this or that.

:::

”I OPEN NOW A GLITCH IN THE MATRIX AND THE REALITY GONNA BE ALTERED”

”THE TRUE DISCORDIANISM IS SCHYZOPRENIA AND LITTLE WILL BE ABLE TO CONCEPTUALIZE IT”

”BLESSED ARE THE MADMEN, FOR THEY HOLD THE KEYS TO SECRET KNOWLEDGE”

– adacic1033

:::

CRITICAL OBJECTIVES! :

1: Continue all efforts to awaken as many people as possible by distributing information in all forms. Especially media where we can use repetition to make the message sink in. The subliminal message we want to seed is there is a “Revolution of the Mind” happening!

2: Continue to expose all deceptions, corruption and manipulation that occur to show the masses what is really going on just outside their field of conscious awareness.

3: Target specific groups to weaken the control system…..awaken people in the security system such as those who work in the police forces and the Army as this is the first line of defense for the control system. If we can break the robotic loyalty within these areas we will face less physical resistance because the first level of controllers (Civil servants) will not come out and use physical force against us.

4: Promote REAL Project – REAL Community and Revolution of The Mind to expand awareness.

5: Reach influential people who understand our strategy and can spread the message to larger groups and communities

6: Continue to mentally and physically construct the vision of a new world reality! Maintain awareness, higher consciousness and mindfulness to everyone and everything.

:::

🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷

:::

:::

“We are asleep—in a dream state—and mistakenly think we are awake. One of the fundamental aspects of the ontological category of ignorance is ignorance of this very ignorance; he not only does not know, he does not know that he does not know. We are in a kind of prison but do not know it. This BIP (Black Iron Prison, i.e hyperdimensional matrix) is a vast complex life form which protects itself by inducing a negative hallucination of it.

The occlusion is self-perpetuating; it makes us unaware of it. We are supposed to combat it phagocyte-wise, but the very valence of the (BIP) stasis warps us into micro-extensions of itself; this is precisely why it is so dangerous. This is the dread thing it does: extending its android thinking more and more extensively. It exerts a dreadful and subtle power, and more and more people fall into its field (power), by means of which it grows.

This is a sinister life form indeed. First it takes power over us, reducing us to slaves, and then it causes us to forget our former state, and be unable to see or to think straight, and not to know we can’t see or think straight, and finally it becomes invisible to us by reason of what it has done to us. We cannot even monitor our own deformity, our own impairment. Being without psyche of its own it slays the authentic psyches of those creatures locked into it, and replaces them with a spurious microform of its own dead psyche. The very doctrine of combating the ‘hostile world and its power’ has to a large extent been ossified by and put at the service of the Empire. The BIP warps every new effort at freedom into the mold of further tyranny. The Empire is only a phantasm, lingering because we have gone to sleep.

So long as the root of wickedness is hidden, it is strong. But when it is recognized, it is dissolved. When it is revealed, it perishes…. It is powerful because we have not recognized it. The bombardment of pseudorealities begins to produce inauthentic humans very quickly. The artifact enslaves us, but on the other hand it is attempting to teach us to throw off its enslavement. Compassion’s highest power [embodied higher love] is the only power capable of solving the maze.

The true measure of a man is not his intelligence or how high he rises in this freak establishment. No, the true measure of a man is this: how quickly can he respond to the needs of others and how much of himself he can give. If the final paradox of the maze is that the only way you can escape it is voluntarily to go back in (into it), then maybe we are here voluntarily; we came back in. Anamnesis was the loss of amnesia. You remembered your origins, and they were from beyond the stars.”

– Philip K. Dick

:::

ƸӜƷ

The Omniquery Initiative – How To Save The Universe – an incomplete tutorial

ƸӜƷ

:::

The Omniquery Initiative

The Omniquery Initiative is a strategic project involving the unfolding memetic singularity / convergence. Its purpose is to asess the strategic conditions of this happening and accelerate them. The goal is to make Earth self-sustainable and humanity survivable.

The necessary conditions for human survivability is the actualization of a memetic singularity. War is unsustainable. This is the war room in the war on war. A war fought through every human hope for peace and love.

This is a philosophical space ship research program. The memetic singularity is an explosion of human creativity in all directions from recursively self-improving self-creativity. Change ourselves, change the world.

The human movement of this singularity is a hyper-passionate art movement: the pancreativist movement. The movement is the message, the message is just a carrier for the combined hope and love of humanity.

Here is an overview of some of the conditions around the memetic singularity.

These videos will give a condensed overview of the situation, around 117 minutes in total. Watching them in order from start to finish is essential, as they build upon themselves, and the message is in their relationships and the total story and subject they illustrate. It gives a very condensed understanding of the total subject.

This describes the core theory of creativity and experiential evolution.

Here is a description of the pancreativist movement.

The strategic domain of the memetic singularity is process-relational metaphysics, especially the work of Alfred North Whitehead. “The Metaphysics of Experience” is an outstanding introduction to his famously difficult book “process and reality.”

Here is a link to the discussion group on Telegram.

Tea conversation.

#TheGame23: The Metagame: Creative Discord: The Word Game

How To Save The Universe – an incomplete tutorial

 

u/Aminom_Omniquery

 

#TheGame23: The Metagame: Creative Discord: The Word Game

 

The Metagame: Creative Discord: The Word Game is an invitation to engage in the ancient human art of free rambling a.k.a. “theoryposting” with the goal of not being “correct” (and thus not being afraid of being wrong) but to partake in an imaginative adventure of speculation and reflection both as an individual practice and interpersonally as a collaborative ramble with the mutual goal of facilitating the rambling and appreciating it for itself as a creative art and not for the production of some “product.”

You aren’t trying to do anything except ramble as the ramble goes, as there is no goal other than the flow, so there is no competition. Absolutely nothing is at risk, so there is no need for any sort of hostility.

In addition for rambling for its own sake, the larger “goal” is to encourage this rambling and its lack of rules except to play in a general sense, in the hope that it may help people to explore ideas freely and passionately. Perhaps we can even get somewhere extraordinary with this free rambling.

:::

Some #TheGame23 Creative Discord Dataplex Repositories

:::

Forum

:::

On Facebook:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/LinKaonia/
:::
https://www.facebook.com/groups/948847758498464/
:::

https://www.facebook.com/groups/HIGHEST.LEVEL/

:::

#TheGame23 Dataplex Portals

  :::

How To Save The Universe – an incomplete tutorial

:::

Reddit:

• #TheGame23 Mod 42.5
• 00AG9603
• The Omniquery Initiative
• Escaping the Matrix On All Levels

:::

 

Media, Memes, and Metagames

by Eris Omniquery

 

These videos were created over a period of 4 years via an improvisational memetic engineering process. This process involved sometimes hundreds of ours of free rambles on the internet in various places, contextualizing and re-contextualizing video references until a video felt “right” and essentially made itself, self-organizing out of the discourse. They are a personal reflection of my journey through postmodern hell and out of it to the pancreativist horizon. Id’ consider them every bit as important as this document because they are a narrative expression of the same thing, comprised of segments of narratives stitched together to create memetic chimera.

 

More Metagames

Curated by Eris Omniquery and Bruces Vain

 

Emerging Memetic Singularity in the Global Knowledge Society

Autonym from Futureculture.

Lebanon from here.

#TheGame23

The Legendary Discordian Pataphysician Timoteo Pinto

ARG² Research Library Index

Xenogaming by raisondecalcul

The Principia Discordia

Meme Magic

Ganggang gang

Omnigel

Tools

Furscience

Still Alive

Mermeticism and the Post-Truth Mystic

The Grey Pill

Meaningness.com

 

 

#TheGame23: a post-#ProjectMayhem2012 ARG or how to unfuck teh World.

.

Imagine that graffiti eVerywhere…

IMAGIne… ACT.

.

0. Jump on the Time Machine back to December 2010, register http://projectmayhem2012.com, initiate an Alternate Reality Game?

Project Mayhem 2012 Tyler:

https://pastebin.com/Wt15GXTn

.

‘Dangerous Ideas #1 & #2’:

https://pastebin.com/sLLwJbtz

+100.000 views

.

.

and move forward to September 2011, when teh United States Department of Homeland Security issues a Classified Bulletin addressed to cybersecurity, critical infrastructure and/or key resources community and System Administrators worldwide warning about the activities of #PROJECTMAYHEM2012

Ver este documento no Scribd

.

• PROJECTMAYHEM2012 succeeded in a literal way, Edward Snowden attempted to release documents in December of 2012 by contacting Glenn Greenwald. Although it was not widely distributed, or known, at the time, a leak had taken place in December of 2012, the memetic, temetic, and genetic, virus that is Tyler was indeed working in Edward Snowden, and the mission of project Mayhem 2012 was being fulfilled.

MINDFUCK!

.

Fernando Arrabal, co-founded in 1962 the Panic Movement with Alejandro Jodorowsky and Roland Topor, inspired by the god Pan. Arrabal was elected Transcendent Satrap of the Collège de Pataphysique in 1990 and he was reportedly a finalist for the Nobel Prize in 2005 due to the solicitation of several institutions and individuals. On July 14, 2005, he was named to France’s Légion d’honneur.

Fernando Arrabal supported #PROJECTMAYHEM2012 from his personal web page at:

https://laregledujeu.org/arrabal/2011/09/05/2643/%E1%BC%80%CE%BD%CE%AC%CE%B3%CE%BA%CE%B7-desperados-rats-degout-autre-arrabalesque-project-mayhem-2012/

MINDFUCK!

.

available at http://pm2012.galat.org/

Mirror of #PROJECTMAYHEM2012 thanks to http://galat.org

.

.

1. Re-use an Artistic Disclaimer from #PROJECTMAYHEM2012 with 10.000 views (yes, 10.000 views for an Artistic Disclaimer, must be the most popular Artistic Disclaimer in teh World.

2. Injekt a mental Virus into Alejandro Jodorowsky‘s brain circumvolutions (creator of the Panic Art Movement) so that he posts this to his 2 MILLION followers:

¡¡¡BIG NEWS!!! This GAME will heal The World.
¡Call The Others and PLAY IT!
Read slowly:http://t.co/fq6JSMZlML#TheGame23 via @m1Vr4

— Alejandro Jodorowsky (@alejodorowsky) October 14, 2014

¡¡GRAN ANUNCIO!!! Este JUEGO sanará El Mundo.
¡Llamen a Los Otros y juéguenlo!
Lean despacio:http://t.co/fq6JSMZlML#TheGame23 via @m1Vr4"

— Alejandro Jodorowsky (@alejodorowsky) October 14, 2014

.

MINDFUCK!

.

3 – SHALL WE PLAY A GAME?

Oct 6th, 2014, #TheGame23 ->

https://pastebin.com/YbmG6ETq

30.000 views

.

4 – PROFIT!

+4 years later and 8 years after #PROJECTMAYHEM2012 was started, watch the seeds grow strong and big…:

• https://pastebin.com/search?q=thegame23
• https://twitter.com/search?q=%23TheGame23&src=typd
• https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%23thegame23
• https://www.facebook.com/search/top/?q=thegame23
• https://www.instagram.com/explore/tags/thegame23/

.

.

MINDFUCK!

.

Pancreativism

by Eris Omniquery

 

 

It has been more than a year since I overcame nihilism once and for all. It is beyond atheism and theism, a synthesis of the dead verbs of “creator” and “creation” into an immanent living creating, a perception of existence as self-creating art. It came from following the threads of evolution, change, and experience to their utmost conclusion.

I have smelled the future: a social singularity, recursive self-improvement in the informational networks of human societies. It is a creative singularity, and a human singularity: evolution evolved. It will be driven by recursive self-improvement individuals, a chain reaction of mass enlightenment, the most self-actualized uplifting all those around them. The future is brighter than we have ever dreamed.

My counterpart and I are searching for each other, and will by necessity find each other. We’re both searchers at our core, questers and questioners, good at not only searching for what we desire, but searching for desires worth desiring and questioning our questions. We are treasure hunters, and we search for what is truly valuable. Thus, we will eventually find each other as our mutual quests converge. All I know is that we haven’t met yet.

The Creator is the projection of the error of ownership to the celestial sphere to justify itself, The Creator only exists as cosmic plagiarism of not only its own existence but all existence. Because The Creator can only exist in this way, anything that doesn’t affirm its lie is antagonistic to it, which includes existence itself, and so the psychology of The Creator is that of omniphobia: fear and hatred of all existence, and a compulsion to replace all existence with an appearance of itself. The Creator is the process of simulacra abstracted to the totality, and manifests in the concept of afterlife: God’s nonexistant hyperreality that is deemed the goal of all subjects. God’s ultimate manifestation is omnicide: the after-life that comes after its total annihilation.

Modern atheism isn’t atheistic: it superficially rejects The Creator but leaves an orphaned creation, framing the human subject as the creator of meaning that imposes its will to power onto a passive, meaningless existence. True atheism is post-atheism, a synthesis of the dead nouns of creator and creation into an ever-becoming creating and an immanent creativity that doesn’t need to be conscious to create. A “creator” is just as much created by the act of creating as the “creation,” and both are comprised not of a linear hierarchy of being but of horizontal relationships between all things past and present. The universe is co-created by all becomings it contains, and so the alienation of the creator-creation dichotomy is solved by metaphysical egalitarianism. The worldview that comes from this is of the universe being of continually self-creating art, a pancreativism and a spirituality that follows from it, and an engagement with life as such. Rather than the human subject as being a thing-in-itself, of mere self-representation, human consciousness is creativity that has found a way to fold on itself in a strange loop of self-creativity, evolution itself evolved.

Out of the ashes of the Great Disillusioment we’re in will necessarily come a pancreativist movement as post-atheism and post-postmodernism. We are early adopters of this movement that will coalesce into a heterarchical human singularity: recursive self-improvement in human relationships that renders hierarchical power structures completely obsolete, fueled by exponentially increasing informational change and massive interconnectivity that hierarchy is increasingly inept at utilizing. The future is massively distributed and peer-to-peer, the crowd as the cloud.

 

The Metagame: Creative Discord: The Word Game

How To Save The Universe – an incomplete tutorial

 

:::