cayneandbbl Cain’s law or Abel’s law? 18-24 minutes The head of “Tysola” , Andrzej Gelberg, challenged me to a duel journalistic. We are to give the pen a vote on the same matter, but that I should say “for” and the editor Gelberg “against” . I am backwards from above . Chances are not equal because the subject of the duel – the death penalty – excludes triumph a man who was her supporter. Is that because? an advocate of taking official life may be worthy any moral or rational triumph? After centuries of struggle for humanitarianism, such a man he should burn with shame, and double: once that he can’t to tame his own bloodsuck, and two that he publicly proclaims praise for the execution. Real Dracula! Although already on the verge of being stripped of victory as a backward- inquisitor, I take part in this rhetorical fencing which I associate it – I say this with the law of joke – with the esque tradition theatrical auditions of “bad esbek” versus “goodesbek “ (I will do here for the ” evil esbek “ who is greedy blood, and edited by Gelberg for the angel of peace). I also take because the matter has a public dimension, it concerns public safety. In practice, the term “publicsecurity “ boils down to the safety of people, Cain’s law or Abel’s law? about: reader? url = https: // … 1 of 13 08/03/2020, 18:25

Page 2

who do not feel safe, vulnerable people, people the weak. Tough guys who don’t have to be defended because they are alone are very few. Weak (children, women, old people, cripples, cowards, badies, etc.) a lot around. Herald the death penalty acts as advocate for the handicapped (handicapped towards degenerates), the function of a defender of parish excellence. I mentioned in a joke SB, which is a non-playful institution and hardly a joke. By the way, I want to remind you fragment of my novel six years ago. It has a title “Dobry” ( “Dobry” is the nickname of the head of the Ministry of the Interior) and her main The institutional heroine is the red Bezpieka. At some point, the action is the main personal hero (Stefan Karśnicki, aka “Prince” ) mercilessly breaks the band sadists raping and mutilating women. His friend, doctor, typical European correct politically, “seeing what the” Prince “did with degenerates, is shocked. A violent dialogue begins. Third participant in the dialogue, Mieczysław Heldbaum (pseudo “Petronius” ), gives the doctor a lecture that could serve me for polemics with the editors of Gelberg without additional argument, because there is almost everything necessary. I quote this fragment of the book: “- What is your right to inflict death?” Asked the ladydoctor. – Even the state when it kills, sanctioning suchretaliation by the paragraphs is not fair because killing itbarbarism, and calling it justice, toobarbarity! In civilized countries, the sentence was abolished Cain’s law or Abel’s law? about: reader? url = https: // … 2 of 13 08/03/2020, 18:25

Page 3

death, loathing her, and rightly so! Can you not?loathe something that offends humanity, dishonorhuman, is humanitarian, bovine …– I’ll tell you something if you want to hear me –“Petronius” interrupted her. In many western countries, inwhose death penalty has been abolished, are murdered unscrupulously andno fear because …– Who are you? she squealed.– Heldbaum, associate of Mr. Karśnicki, at your service.“I don’t need your services, Mr. Heldbaum!”“Certainly, but you need a compass to move.”feel sorry for the land so that you can reachcompassionate, that is, those that they deserve nothose you now show pity for. In these countries, Fr.which I mentioned, very often is murdered orit mutilates children. There are many causes, from sexual,by kidnaping and sadistic, until revenge onparents. But the main reason is the lack of fear ofcruel punishment! The kidnapper is nervous, or ransomis late, so cut, baby in the head. Or suffocating them. Or eat themmelts. The Sicilian Mafia just shot twoseven-year-old boys and their mother, because daddy has done something wronglords of mafiosom. A band in Milan last weekthe kidnappers burst into the industrialist’s house to kidnaphis daughter, his mother covered her and she didn’t want to give it back, somother and child dropped and went away. Pif-paf !, yes aftersimply, madam, is it difficult to press on the trigger?Or plant a bomb in a department store? Łatwiusieńko. Cain’s law or Abel’s law? about: reader? url = https: // … 3 of 13 08/03/2020, 18:25

Page 4

Such things happen in these countries for three hundredsixty-five days a year. And I’m just talking aboutchildren, adults are killed more often, forto killers, human life is worth as much as lifechicken. Do you know who? Thanks madam. And thanks to suchlike you– You are crazy, it’s bullshit, I won’t listen to it! –she whispered.– Do I force you? Please turn around and walk away.To run away from the truth, to be offended by the truth, yescalled a Greek pretend, it’s very easy, almost like thateasy, like cutting a finger or ear of a kidnapped child toparents softened. Let’s agree that I will keep talking and youwill show me my back when you want and you will be goneshe had to put up with my words. I will keep talking about childrenbecause it better goes to the imagination. Even to the imaginationwomen … You know what the scourge of the countries where it reignscivilization? So-called Mafia promotional campaignsnarcotic. A group of bandits in front of each schoolgives children cocaine or heroin sweets. After a fewsuch a kid is addicted for lifea drug addict. Or cute stickers for notebooks. Childrenstick them licking glue – glue saturated with cocaine. A fewstickers and you have a client for all his wasted life.Almost unpunished activities, because even if someone comes up with ithe is only threatened by a cell with a TV, from which his buddies anywaylawyers will release them sooner or later …She couldn’t leave as if he had enchanted her. But it amazed her Cain’s law or Abel’s law? about: reader? url = https: // … 4 of 13 08/03/2020, 18:25

Page 5

in anger:– What do you want to prove? That murder inis that a righteous act ?! Or is it a virtue?“I just want to justify what I’ve already pointed out.” Because youhe is wrong. They are people like you who demand abolitiondeath sentences or elsewhere insist on maintaining thisabolition, using terms such as: humanitarianism,barbarism, cruelty, sadism, human tramplingdignity and the like, they are trampling on dignityhuman! They tread on the dignity of the abused man,murdered with impunity, and deprive him of his rights by engagingdefending the killers. The right to life is to have whatunscrupulously takes the life of others! Humanitarianism formurderers, and what about the victims? Obituary right, right?I think that this is insulting humanity,because it’s a denial of the right to dispose of your ownlife, it’s trampling on people who are buried, who don’tthey deserved cruel, unexpected and not guilty death.This is your selective humanitarianism, intended onlyfor thugs, while a pile of victims is a pile of dry leaves,it’s a shame to bother, he is barbaric,because it creates a civilization of cheap life that can be taken awaylike the item! By signing on their appeals andpetitions, you sign blank consents for murderers onunpunished murder!“It’s a disgusting demagogy, how can you say that!” Mrhe doesn’t believe what you say! Don’t you know …– I know! I know what they write, I know these wise men from you Cain’s law or Abel’s law? about: reader? url = https: // … 5 of 13 08/03/2020, 18:25

Page 6

album of good hearts! The death penalty does not deter thisprove statistics! Someone rightly said they existthree types of lies: lies, damn lies andstatistics. You can even prove using statisticsthat the Earth is flat – most people see it flat. Orthat the Sun is wandering around the Earth – millions see it. Butthis is not true. Punishment scares away, and death penalty scares awayvery! It will not scare off someone who kills a gacha in affectionhis wife in the act, but he will scare away those whoin cold blood they commit crimes – kidnappers, bandits,sadists, they think three times, too much risk. In thatthe district will not be a rapist for a long time, I can vouch you! …She was silent, unable or unable to snorkel, and hegave a chord for the finale, for a knockout, he wanted to calculate it:– Time to look at your own heart, dear lady. Never noI will understand why big-hearted people like youproponents of abolishing the most severe punishment have so littlerespect, so little heart, so little humanityfor a four-year girl raped and strangled, orfor the family of the guard who was shot, and so manynoble words for the defense of a villain who, for lack of somewhores on hand hurt this girl, or orphanedanother, and for a drug dealer who makes everything miserablegenerations? People like you do not defend the right to life, butfreedom of robbing life, they support the edifice of fear, andthey destroy the edifice of freedom that the individual should haveright. I wish you many nice years without the evening noscheduled meetings with individuals at which Mrs. Cain’s law or Abel’s law? about: reader? url = https: // … 6 of 13 08/03/2020, 18:25

Page 7

vote! “ As I have already mentioned – this quote could be enough for the whole polemic about official extermination. But I’m afraid my partner would be disappointed then (such a literary catwalk) because he expects fencing more seriously, more scientifically. Then I’ll quit below several dozen sentences, partly scientific. first step will be the magical art Conan Doyle bestowed on his forensic virtuoso – deduction, called earlier by Edgar Poe ‘analytical ability We agreed with the editor Gelberg that we write ours without knowing the text of the polemic, thus wanting to defend the death penalty, I must first guess what is mine the polemist will sue her. If I guess wrong, I lie down I’ll shoot at cheers, cities to the goal (another handicap making the duel a unequal opportunity). But a word said, the glove was taken. Fortunately, the batteries of the enemies are death penalty plus minus known, so even my pudgy “mental abilities called analytical” are enough for locate a few of these guns. My guess is that ed. Gelberg will fire four missiles. Maybe the order will be different, but the rockets will probably be as follows: 1. Religious or decalogical 2. Ethical or humanitarian 3. Political or totalitarian 4. Statistical or effective Cain’s law or Abel’s law? about: reader? url = https: // … 7 of 13 08/03/2020, 18:25

Page 8

Let’s take these arguments in the order above I determined: 1. Decalogue The fifth commandment says: “Do not kill!” . He says so only the fifth commandment translated, because the Hebrew original says something else. The word “rasah” used there means: to murder, so the original content of the fifth commandment is: “Don’t murder” ( “Do not murder!” ). For killings war, and for the death penalty, the Hebrew language has other verbs: for the first “harag” , for the second “hemit” . Opponents of the main penalty know this, but They claim that linguistic differences are juggling semantic, which does not change the total ban. Religion he doesn’t allow any killings, he can’t take his life to anyone and under no circumstances what the Decalogue teaches! – they say these good people, and their words are a classic “reductio”ad absurdum “ , which is complete nonsense. For if we were according to this interpretation, they were to treat the fifth commandment, no we would be allowed to defend against the aggression of the house, family, homeland, myself, nothing, for defending myself we could kill the attacker or commit fatal – nomen omen – sin. On the other hand, he spoke about the official death penalty recently Franco Cardini, religion historian, expert Christianity, Islam and Judaism (by the way a Catholic). At an international conference on punishment death (Tunis, October 1995) Cardini stated that in the scriptures of any monotheistic religion are impossible Cain’s law or Abel’s law? about: reader? url = https: // … 8 of 13 08/03/2020, 18:25

Page 9

find any barring ban, or enforcement of the death penalty. 2. Ethics Here the supporter of the main penalty falls on Niagar’s head counterarguments (from humanist kindergarten through civilization or any anti-barbarian formation, after elemental decency) and quotes from people’s writings good – merciful – noble (even a sentence Albert Camus: “The death penalty is a homicide whichpremeditation is record-breaking “ ). Summa summary: punishment death is an immoral act, absolutely record-breaking shameful that you have to do everything to eliminate it! The civilization of death that now reigns and which consists in in that criminals carry out executions with impunity, and their victims have only one right (for burial) – it can be healed only by taking life for taking life, or the most severe punishment. No penalty is equal shameful, fundamentally immoral, pathological allowing the civilization of death to continue to gather its own wicked harvest. Any system where the only penalty is murder is a prison cell, the system in which the victim has less right to life than murderers. With each the prison comes out (thanks to amnesty, polite duties, bribery, etc.) to freedom. From the grave itself is not coming out. Such a system – probandic, dismissive murder victims, I am disgusted because it is clinical injustice. 3. Policy Cain’s law or Abel’s law? about: reader? url = https: // … 9 of 13 08/03/2020, 18:25

Page 10

There may be an argument that legalization or custom (practice) the death penalty is a kind of machinery prepared for possible criminal pharaohs – facilitate mass genocide like Hitler and Stalin murdering opponents, cleansing, decimating of the population, etc. However, if it were to be, it would be not serious, because totalitarianism is therefore totalitarianism, because he disregards all laws, even the laws that he himself creates and creates the codes he wants and whenever he wants. I am reminded of the legalism of the sadistic emperor in ancient Rome: when legally desired, according to by law, murder all members of a family, or community, and the law strictly forbade to condemn virgins to death, he ordered the praetorians to they had raped all virgins before, which liquidated legal barrier. 4. Statistics Crown argumentation of the death penalty enemies. They claim notorious that, according to research and statistics, practice death penalty does not reduce severe at all crime, in even a minimal percentage, nul! Well this is complete nonsense. Apart from the fact that that “There are three types of lies: lies, damn lies andstatistics “ (no one can decide who the author was anymore this bon-motu, Disarelli or Twain) – only shuffling statistical juggling, cultivated for a long time time left by the political correctness coat of arms , offered results well serving followers no murdering murderers. The realities were completely different, so Cain’s law or Abel’s law? about: reader? url = https: // … 10 of 13 08/03/2020, 18:25

Page 11

when in the US realities began to reveal how the avalanche started in subsequent states the process of restoring the death penalty. It has been restored in 37 states, even where previously there was a record number of enemies’ lobby death sentences – in New York state. Effect? From the moment restoring the death penalty, as well as tightening actions police and tightening court judgments, one of the most dangerous cities in the world, New York, instantly became one of the safer cities US. Only last year (1995) was recorded there the lowest crime rate of twenty-three years and the number of murders has fallen by almost half! They say that statistics. Statistics not pulled into the thesis, about which everyone A New Yorker can find out in the evening by walking pavements of his town. Honest statistics say also that leniency results in increased judgments, because when the state does not fulfill one of its main ones obligations to people (ensuring safety) is people must defend themselves. Among 184 member states of the UN – the death penalty in 96 it is being done. Various associations and groups (such as like the League of Citizens and Parliamentarians for Abolition Death penalty until 2000, whose slogan is “Don’t killCain! “ ) – they do everything to completely eliminate the punishment main practice of homines sapiens. Shuffling statistics are further the main weapon of these “humanists” . Finally, a few conclusions of the concluding type: The threat of death penalty will not stop a man Cain’s law or Abel’s law? about: reader? url = https: // … 11 of 13 08/03/2020, 18:25

Page 12

who murders in so-called affect, sometimes (or often) will stop a criminal who thinks about the effect, i.e. cold calculates what pays off. Death against the murderer will not bring life back to the victim murder, but the didactic (persuasive) burden of the broadcast executions will save some potential victims, because potential killers recalculate the risk. Not applying the death penalty (its legal liquidation, or moratorium on the performance) encourages criminals, ridiculing the security system, orphaning children, declares that the rights of those killed are none in comparison with rights of killers. A system that allows mass murder of defenseless people children (abortion) and doesn’t allow eliminating “killers” – he’s from immoral, mean, disgusting ground. The only rational and ethically sensible argument against the death penalty is a possibility of legal error, co happened more than once in history. So this punishment should be ferred only with 100% proof (never circumstantial) and only against very serious crimes (especially violent, sadistic, or crimes whose victims are children) and to killers degenerate, not repentant or sorry. In Poland, death sentences have been enforced for several years massively – by bandits. Bandits in Poland for several years no death penalty. Bandits in Poland have been punishing for several years defenseless people for the thoughtlessness of power. Circle up closes, vulgo: closed circulation of death civilization Cain’s law or Abel’s law? about: reader? url = https: // … 12 of 13 08/03/2020, 18:25

Page 13

terrorizes the community of the country where people are put before the tribunal and sentenced because they dared actively defend your life or property during an assault bandits emboldened by the tolerant tolerance of crime. WALDEMAR ŁYSIAK The above text has not been bred a social rebellion against the death penalty the rebellion caused some spectacular murders in the spring. Identical sentence regarding death penalty and general I have publicly articulated leniency for many years times. A proposal for this journalistic duel edited by Gelberg in January, and I begun my article at the beginning of February and later I could only patiently wait for the adversary text. W. L. From the President of KS Most likely, an error has crept in the post scriptum. Spectacular murders caused a revolt against the moratorium on punishment then in force death.


Sobre duzyzoltyptak


Deixe um comentário

Preencha os seus dados abaixo ou clique em um ícone para log in:

Logo do

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Sair /  Alterar )

Imagem do Twitter

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Twitter. Sair /  Alterar )

Foto do Facebook

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Facebook. Sair /  Alterar )

Conectando a %s

%d blogueiros gostam disto: